Related Court Opinions
The following are additional court opinions in cases that were handled by the firm:
- The firm prevailed on a motion for summary judgment on all claims in a Title VII and Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuit in federal court in Florida. The plaintiff claimed that her termination was motivated by her pregnancy. Selkow v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2012 WL 2054872 (M.D.Fla. 2012).
- Our client was awarded summary judgment in an Age Discrimination in Employment Act lawsuit in federal court in Texas. The plaintiff was terminated as part of a reduction in force. Rosenblatt v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2007 WL 2187252 (N.D.Tex. 2007).
- Angela DiPilato v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 07 cv 7636 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). Obtained dismissal of franchise discrimination lawsuit with prejudice and award of attorneys’ fees against plaintiff.
- See also Angela DiPilato v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2009 WL 2633130 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (discrimination in connection with franchise application)
- Kenneth Quansah v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2009 WL 1885621 (N.D.Cal. 2009) (employment-related claims)
- Tamara Fields v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2008 WL 2986164 (D.Colo. 2008). Prevailed on summary judgment in Title VII discrimination lawsuit in Colorado.
- Getachew v. 7-Eleven, 2005 WL 2365334 (10th Cir. 2005). Prevailed on summary judgment in Title VII discrimination case in Colorado, and defended judgment on appeal to Tenth Circuit.
- Sheikh v. 7-Eleven, 2004 WL 3584088 (D.Md. 2004), aff’d 142 Fed.Appx. 785, 2005 WL 2211662 (4th Cir. 2005), cert. denied 126 S.Ct. 1587 (2006). Prevailed on summary judgment in Title VII discrimination and retaliation case in Maryland, and defended judgment on appeal to Fourth Circuit.
Any information contained on this website with respect to results obtained by Welter Law Firm lawyers is not meant to indicate that the same or similar results can or will be obtained in other cases or situations. Results will vary depending on the facts and circumstances of each individual matter. Prior results do not predict, warrant or guarantee a similar outcome. Images may be those of actors depicting fictional scenes. References to past or present clients or the circumstances of their specific matters do not constitute testimonials or endorsements by such clients, nor are they a guaranty, warranty or prediction of the outcome of your legal matter.